Skip Nav

Utilitarianism essay.

From the SparkNotes Blog

❶He supports this claim by showing that all the other objects of people's desire are either means to happiness, or included in the definition of happiness. Bentham developed this principle throughout a number of writings, including his most significant work of moral philosophy, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation

Introduction

Found what you're looking for?
How to cite this page
Just another philosophy blog

Imagine that the neighbour is desperate to find someone to exercise his canine companion, while your friends are fully capable of enjoying themselves without you. His ideas here are, really, quite simple.

Naturally, it follows from this that he also felt that we should treat unhappiness as something consisting of pain. This view on happiness has led his particular brand of utilitarianism to be seen as a hedonistic theory. Furthermore, Bentham did not distinguish between different forms of pleasure. To him, anything that gave rise to happiness — be it drugs or reading — was fundamentally good.

According to Mill, these latter pleasures are of a greater quality, and should therefore be considered more important. He posited that someone who has experienced both forms of pleasure would naturally feel inclined to choose the higher pleasures.

This is a fairly straightforward exploration of the most common forms of utilitarianism. Sir, may I know your name? And ask a permission if I can get some parts in your essay that I may use for my Related Literature for my thesis.

Therefore, if society were to embrace utilitarianism as an ethic, people would naturally internalize these standards as morally binding. Mill argues that happiness is the sole basis of morality, and that people never desire anything but happiness. He supports this claim by showing that all the other objects of people's desire are either means to happiness, or included in the definition of happiness. Mill explains at length that the sentiment of justice is actually based on utility, and that rights exist only because they are necessary for human happiness.

The theory of utilitarianism has been criticized for many reasons. Critics hold that it does not provide adequate protection for individual rights, that not everything can be measured by the same standard, and that happiness is more complex than reflected by the theory.

Mill's essay represents his attempt to respond to these criticisms, and thereby to provide a more complex and nuanced moral theory. Mill's argument comprises five chapters.

For the sake of this writing though, I will categorise each philosopher to their assumed approach. As he thought more that happiness should be the standard of utility, not the self-centred pleasure. This improves the theory, as otherwise everybody will be focussing on themselves, and in many situations the pleasure of one person may exclude the happiness of many. I think it is also more appropriate inside the theory; as, if one looks out for the community, it seems more likely that the greatest good for the greatest number will be reached.

The higher pleasures taking preference over the lower kinds of pleasures seem to fit with the quality of life, education and so forth.

However, there is a danger that this idea quickly becomes snobbish, and puts the higher classes above those who would prefer rap music over opera.

This shows how the theory is counter-intuitive in some areas; in how the community has importance, and not just the individual; and yet Mill still argues that the quality of pleasure takes precedence over the quantity, which seems to contradict the idea of community, and involve multiple classes. He makes an inductive leap in saying that just because one person desires their own happiness they will naturally aim for the happiness of everyone else.

John Rawls was known for criticising Mill and how it is not ethical to assume that one person would do something for a group, and how people can be used a means to an end because of that. Theoretically it is a suitable idea, that everyone would look out for the happiness for everyone else, but in practice it is not logical, he is separating morality and motive. An alternative approach to Utilitarianism would be that of Henry Sidgwick.

Accessed September 15, We will write a custom essay sample on Ethics Utilitarianism specifically for you. Leave your email and we will send you an example after 24 hours

Learn more

Main Topics

Privacy Policy

Free Essays from Bartleby | “Utilitarianism is the view that the supreme principle of morality is to act so as to produce as much happiness as possible, each.

Privacy FAQs

Free utilitarianism papers, essays, and research papers. Utilitarianism: The Greatest Happiness Principle - Utilitarianism was first brought up along the nourishing of “The Greatest Happiness Principle” introduced by Jeremy Bentham and further developed by John Stuart Mill, who was a follower of Bentham (Sweet, ).

About Our Ads

Classical utilitarianism is hedonistic, it believes that happiness is the one ultimate good and unhappiness is the one ultimate evil but utilitarianism has changed slightly from this completely simpli /5(20). Essays and criticism on John Stuart Mill's Utilitarianism - Critical Essays.

Cookie Info

Mar 24,  · This essay - or post if you wish - is intended as a concise exploration of utilitarianism, one of many ethical movements within the world of moral philosophy. An understanding of this topic could prove useful to IB philosophy students taking ethics as one of their chosen options. I am focusing here on the nature of. Free Essay: Utilitarianism is an ethical theory proposed by Jeremy Bentham and defended by James Mill. The theory says, that all the activities should be.