Bearing in mind the current state of the planet Earth, should humans consider the colonization of the rest of the galaxy? Do rich nations have an ethical obligation to welcome refugees of other countries whose economies they may have damaged beyond repair? Should the right to consume intoxicants and hallucinogens be enshrined in law?
Should parents who allow or encourage their children to become super morbidly obese be treated as child abusers and suffer the full penalties under law? Is the concept of land ownership unethical as posited by Rousseau?
Should people be encouraged to limit population growth until the human population matches that which the planet can sustainably maintain? Should people be allowed to engage in hunting for the sole purpose of entertainment?
Is the compulsory education system as it appears in many countries a form of immoral mental control over children? Are members of oppressed minority groups kept back by policies which encourage them to see cultures foreign to themselves as innately superior? Can a clear distinction between instrumental good and intrinsic good be maintained?
Is pleasure an intrinsic good? Is the fulfillment of desire an intrinsic good? Is beauty an intrinsic good? Is knowledge an intrinsic good? Are moral qualities an intrinsic good? Is "Socrates dissatisfied better than a pig satisfied"? Is happiness just the sum of individual pleasures? Is pleasure merely a side-product of activity? Does psychological egoism commit the fallacy of overgeneralization? Is psychological egoism tautologous? Are all human actions unconsciously and egoistically motivated?
Do people always do what they desire most? Can personal ethical egoism be refuted? Can individual ethical egoism be refuted? Is Down's Syndrome—moderate retardation—grounds for an abortion? How late can an abortion be performed? How early can an abortion be performed? Is the "morning-after pill? Should the community regulate contraception or is this for the individual to decide?
How should the community relate to the problem of suicide? Should there be any legal constraints at all? Might it be allowed only to stop the suffering of the terminally ill? What about people whose illnesses deprive life of its meaning—not terminal, but severely handicapped, or dying over years, but not immediately terminal.
Should they be allowed to kill themselves? What about those who can't do it themselves? Should assisted suicide be allowed?
What about those who can't even decide? Should euthanasia be allowed in any circumstances? If they are left in a vegetative state after an accident, stroke, etc. Should a consideration of the legal device of advanced directives be made a compulsory unit—you don't have to sign it, but you do have to discuss why you won't—for people at age 80? Is there a "right" to parenthood? Should we support anyone who wants to be a parent in this activity?
What if they are thought to be "unfit"? What makes a person "unfit" as a parent? This is related to the next topic of abuse. How much attention does a child really need?
How nice must the housing be? What if a parent cannot protect a child from the bullying of other children? Under what circumstances, if a parent has "lost" the right to parent for a while, should that right be re-instated? When should it not be? What about conditions for adopting babies? Animal Rights What rights should animals have? Our sensitivity to other peoples, minorities, etc.
We're less tolerant of rank cruelty. What about intermediate conditions, excessive constraints in raising livestock, for instance?
Supervision and regulation of animal farms, e. How "sacred" is life itself? How heroic are we obligated to be in near-terminal conditions? How much money should be spent to attempt to keep alive a 2 month-premature infant?
A 3-month premature infant? The limits of viability gradually are pushed down along with an exponential increase in cost and resources. Just because science can do something, it raises the question whether it should be done. Should we begin to consider rationing health care for the very old, those with senility?
Again, a disproportionate amount of money is being spent for near-heroic procedures for those whose prognosis is guarded. What about liver transplants for alcoholics, drug abusers with Hepatitis C, etc? Expensive AIDS treatment for those whose lives were reckless? Lung transplants or other heroic treatments for inveterate smokers? Should we differentiate between mild and severe disability in considering the allocation of costs of help?
Differences between prognosis—how likely that help will yield substantial changes in function? Do we need to re-negotiate our standards in times of significant economic constraints, recession, economic depression? What standards of safety do we wish to set?
Is there a "right" to be protected even from our own foolishness? Should government get out of the business of telling people what substances they can or can not put into their bodies? A strict "libertarian" stance.
Oxycontin , sedatives, ecstasy MDMA , etc.? How much should we regulate different types of foods and drugs? Should many of the alternative and herbal medicines that slip through the technical net of FDA requirements be brought under that process? Or should we return to a "buyer beware" type of ethos? What about liability for accidents? Are some lawsuits becoming excessively lenient towards people doing dumb things, like getting drunk and laying down on the railroad tracks? How much "purity" can we afford in air pollution, ground pollution, water pollution, or food pollution standards?
There are some carcinogens in foods naturally that are present in far greater concentration than some so-called carcinogens from other "artificial" sources, but these latter must be reduced to almost impossibly low levels.
What obligations do we have to the environment? To what extent must we go to preserve species of animals or plants?
How much intervention in foreign affairs is ethical in the service of "saving" forests, whales, various other ecological systems? Should corruption in politics be dealt with more severely? What kinds of ethical standards are appropriate for those in greater power, in government or business?
Philosophy Ethics Position Paper Topics To see the most recent changes on this page and the papers themselves, be sure to click the "Refresh" or .
Essays covering interesting ethical topics are often assigned to students, and this list of potential topics was designed for students. These topics and subtopics might inspire you when writing your next essay, position paper, or speech. Courage can come in subtle forms, and that can include.
A List of Debatable Ethics Research Paper Topics. In the world of ethics there are many talked about subjects. Some of the more well-known topics are gay marriage, abortion, animal rights, and war, but do you know of some of the lesser well-known ones? A course in ethics may focus on business and modern science ethics, along with humanities, management and social sciences. Writing an ethics paper is a task you will be given during your ethics course, which requires you to choose a topic and argue whether it is ethical or not, using facts such as statistics to back your position.
Research within librarian-selected research topics on Ethics from the Questia online library, including full-text online books, academic . 22 Examples Of Great Research Paper Topics On Ethics Writing a research paper on ethics can be trickier than it seems at first. While most people understand and accept universal moral rules, they can interpret them differently.