In May of , the U. Supreme Court ruled against term limits in Congress in the case of U. By a vote, the justices found that states could not lawfully impose term limits on representatives or senators. The matter did not resurface in Congress, though some members made individual pledges to limit their own terms. Some stood by their word and did not run for reelection when their time was up; others changed their minds and continued pursuing politics as a career path.
Whether there will ever be term limits in Congress is largely a matter for the public to decide. There have been times when this issue is a very popular and hotly contested one, and other times when top voices seem mostly quiet on the topic. In many ways the entire congressional structure is built around an understanding of rank and seniority, and this would necessarily have to change if term limits were in place. Why not start a petition?
We can get plenty of support especially with the Occupy Wall Street movement. Once elected, they work for the bettering of themselves, and the hell with the American people. It should be a limited time they work, so if not they are not approved by the citizens of the US, we could get them out and replace them with others who will do what's best for the people. There has been no change through the years as the United States has revolved around all these long-term politicians.
The purpose of this amendment was to propose an amendment to the Constitution that limits the number of terms a member of Congress may serve. You can check out the roll call on this at the senate website. Fresh new blood brings new ideas and methods into the playing field. Negotiate and compromise would have true value in supporting the folks who elected them into office. Term limits in the Supreme Court would limit left or right ideologies. They would preserve as well as represent the US Constitution.
They represent "we the people" and as Americans, we should not accept anything less. By walking the walk and talking the talk, we can inspire the world. Do you really think those guys and girls are going to vote themselves out of a job? What we should do is have a law passed that would make it a federal offense for a lobbyist to do any kind of business involving the government or to even show up on the hill, with an absolutely certain jail term involved.
Then, have another law passed that would put a limit on any contributions made by large corporations or rich people or banks to representatives that were running for office and that would include the president and anyone that is running for that office. I think that would curb a lot of this crap that goes on in Washington. The cancer that is killing American Democracy is the money spent on campaigns.
How can a person raise 10's of millions and not favor that source's interests? I am sure that this is why Asian factories were allowed to run my industry printed circuit boards completely out of America. England is much smaller than USA, but they do have ceilings on their campaign spending. I am confident that the advertising agencies who earns millions off of campaigns are contributing back to those congressmen to not limit the money that can be spent on them!
Do you people really continue to hold on to the myth that the Politicians are elected by you, the voter? The government is run by the big banks, big corporations and that is all there is to it. They are the ones who pick and choose who will be the "Peoples representatives". It is a fact, live with it. Where do I go to sign up. I'm asian, so curious about your nation's political thing. I hope that i can reply asap. What do we really have to lose?
If all of you are fed up as much as I am let's start a movement that can be heard all the way to Washington! Congressmen are now looking more towards their next job opportunity and less at what they're doing right now. Usually their best offers are coming from the companies that the lobbyists represent. As much as we like to pretend that government is so simple, anybody can do it with a little common sense, the truth is that it's a series of enormously complex areas that you need a lot of knowledge to truly understand.
If you are continuously throwing new people in there who don't have the knowledge base, they're going to listen to people who appear to - the lobbyists. That's how I looked up this site. Where is the online petition? And there needs to be a petition for term limits for the supreme court as well.
Those appointments can be you scratch my back I'll scratch yours just like the Congress! Nothing should be for life in Washington! Rip Post 6 Term limits would be one of the greatest turning points of this country. We do not need these strongly biased individuals making our very important decisions for a life time.
If not then we should limit only persons to be of age 65 and over after passing an IQ test and medical tests regarding mental illness related to age, to qualify for appointment. They should be of sound physical health. This would limit them to a more reasonable term.
Life is getting short after I know from experience. It would stop special interest groups from helping to get things like Cap and Tax and this so called health reform bill through. What would be the pros and cons? Term Limits has just launched an on-line petition for Congressional term limits.
The goal is to compile a list of Americans who support this reform that is so enormous it cannot be ignored. Draining the swamp has bipartisan support. So I say we get this done. For those who fear term limits might reduce the relevant expertise needed to get things done I would respectfully submit that if years is not enough time for a member to master the legislative process, then the member has no business serving in Congress in the first place.
Others object to term limits on the grounds that the founders already built term limits into the Constitution: But if this is true why, as my Democratic colleague Rep. The American people feel Congress as an institution is broken and failing to do its fundamental job, yet the structural advantages of incumbency are so great that few people ever get fired from this job.
But I do believe they are an important step. The more divided we are along party lines, the better for them. My predecessor—a true citizen-legislator who spent his life building a successful roofing company—made a point that has stuck with me. He said that his self-imposed term limit meant that every day he went to work in Congress he knew he had one less day to make a difference.
As a result he woke up every day with a sense of urgency and fearlessness to do the right thing on behalf of his constituents, not do what was expedient for his political career.
Imagine if all elected members of the House and Senate woke up with that same urgency and sense of purpose. Imagine what we could accomplish together. View the discussion thread. Skip to main content. A time for congressional term limits By Rep. Don't miss a brief.
The term limits for Congress grassroots revolt is spreading like wildfire. Help us bypass Congress and impose term limits on the House and Senate by signing the national term limits .
However, Constitutional amendments require a two-thirds majority, or votes, and the votes to restrict term limits fell short of that number. Court Rulings. In May of , the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against term limits in .
Sign the term limits on Congress petition: Therefore Be It Resolved, that I do hereby support a Term Limits Convention to enact a constitutional amendment for term limits on members of the U.S. Senate and on members of The House of Representatives. Others object to term limits on the grounds that the founders already built term limits into the Constitution: every two years for a member of the House and every six years in the Senate via elections.
Watch video · During the presidential campaign, Donald Trump made term limits for Congress an integral part of his plan for how to make Washington less, well, swampy. We didn't hear much from him about the idea. The New Jersey House also passed a term limits measure in , but the state Senate, relying on an advisory opinion from its in-house counsel that term limits are unconstitutional, refused to vote on the bill.